In recent years, sexual abuse scandals within religious institutions have come to light, exposing widespread misconduct and the failure of organizations to protect vulnerable individuals. Once such a case involving a former Roman Catholic priest has garnered significant attention, the Michigan Supreme Court will hear arguments relating to the matter this month. This landmark case has the potential to set new legal precedents and hold institutions accountable for their role in enabling and covering up instances of sexual abuse.
Depending on how the Michigan Supreme Court rules next week in the case involving Brian McLain’s accusations of sexual abuse against the former Diocese of Lansing, individuals whom clergy have sexually abused may have more time to file lawsuits against their abusers. If you have suffered in silence after facing abuse at the hands of a trusted religious figure, contact an experienced Okemos clergy sex abuse lawyer at White Law PLLC. We may be able to help you obtain justice for the abuse you suffered as a child.
Background of the Former Diocese of Lansing Sexual Abuse Case
The sexual abuse case stems from a case initially filed in 2021 by plaintiff Brian McLain against Roman Catholic priest Richard Lobert, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Lansing, and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore. In his lawsuit, McClain alleges Lobert sexually abused him in 1999 while a minor at the W.J. Maxey Boys Training School. He claims negligence on the part of all three defendants.
Your Fight Is Our Fight
Legal Issues in McLain v. Lobert
The central issue of McLain’s legal claim revolves around Michigan’s statute of limitations, found at MCL §600.5805, which sets a deadline for filing a personal injury lawsuit. In Michigan, the statute of limitations for personal injury lawsuits is generally three years after the date of the injury; however, there are exceptions for cases where the plaintiff might not discover the cause of their injury until later. In 2018, the state’s legislature amended the statute of limitations in MCL §600.5851b regarding sex abuse cases involving clergy or other individuals in positions of authority, allowing victims to file lawsuits any time before turning 28 or within three years of discovering the damage caused by the abuse.
McClain’s case is one of these exceptions. McLain argues that due to the trauma of the abuse he faced at the hands of Lobert, he did not discover the connection between his abuse and the emotional distress he was experiencing until 2020. He claims this delayed discovery should extend the time limit for filing his lawsuit.
The Issue of Delayed Discovery in Michigan Sexual Abuse Cases
The Michigan Court of Appeals initially ruled in favor of McLain, allowing his lawsuit to proceed. The court considered the delayed discovery argument and the statute of limitations, specifically mentioning the exception for cases where the causal relationship between the wrongful act and the resulting injury is not discovered until later. The Diocese of Lansing appealed this decision to the Michigan Supreme Court, which has agreed to hear the case next week.
The central question for the court revolves around the concept of delayed discovery and its impact on the state’s statute of limitations. McLain’s case hinges on whether his claim of emotional distress stemming from childhood sexual abuse falls under the delayed discovery exception to Michigan’s statute of limitations. The court’s decision has the potential to set a significant legal precedent regarding the statute of limitations in sexual abuse cases, particularly in Michigan.
We understand that you may be going through a difficult situation and we are ready to help however we can.
Potential Precedent from the McLain v. Lobert Ruling
The ruling on this matter can have several potential impacts. These impacts will affect the legal options for survivors of clergy abuse. Potential precedent may include the following:
- A broader application of delayed discovery: If the Michigan Supreme Court rules in favor of McLain, it could establish a broader precedent for delayed discovery in sexual abuse cases. This precedent could allow future victims who repressed memories or struggled to connect their abuse experiences with emotional or psychological problems to file lawsuits even if years have passed since the abuse occurred.
- A focus on the impact trauma can have on a person: A ruling in McClain’s favor could emphasize the psychological impact of childhood abuse and the potential for delayed recognition of its effects. This could encourage courts to be more understanding of victims who come forward years later.
- Encouragement for victims to break their silence: According to Child USA’s delayed disclosure fact sheet, 62% of abuse victims remain silent about their abuse. A ruling in McLain’s favor could inspire victims to disclose their abuse in hopes that they can still seek justice against their abusers.
While the McLain v. Lobert case is specific to Michigan law, the outcome could have a ripple effect on similar cases in other states because they might consider the arguments presented and potentially re-evaluate their approaches to delayed discovery in sexual abuse lawsuits. If you are in a similar situation or have been sexually abused by clergy in the past, contact our clergy sex abuse lawyers. We can evaluate your claims and determine whether you have the legal standing to file a lawsuit against your abuser.
You will always work directly with your attorney throughout your case.
Uncertainties and Importance of the Former Diocese of Lansing Sexual Abuse Case
The ultimate legal precedence will remain unclear until the Michigan Supreme Court’s final decision is released. However, this case is significant because it addresses the complexities of trauma, memory, and the long-term effects of sexual abuse on victims. The court’s decision will be watched closely by our clergy sex abuse attorneys at White Law PLLC, other legal professionals, and survivors’ rights advocates nationwide.
Do Not Fight for Justice Against Your Abuser without Our Help
Clergy sex abuse cases can be complex due to factors such as statutes of limitation and the emotional trauma experienced by survivors. Next week’s Michigan Supreme Court hearing regarding the sexual abuse case involving the former diocese of Lansing may set a legal precedent and give abuse survivors hope for obtaining justice. If you or someone you know has been a victim of clergy sex abuse, contact our experienced clergy sex abuse lawyers at White Law PLLC for a free consultation, taking an important step towards getting justice and holding responsible parties accountable for their actions.
We’re Experienced. We Care.
We Exceed Client Expectations.